From: Tom B. (Tehom) <te...@pa...> - 2012-04-13 15:53:26
|
> On Friday, April 13, 2012, Ted Felix wrote: > >> Looks like the problem is static initialization order: > > I am in awe. Good grief man, if I ever figured that out, it would have > taken > me a solid week at minimum. Talk about a tricky bug to figure out! Yes, that was impressive debugging! >> This at least gives you what you want even if there is a bit of a >> double-maintenance headache (however unlikely) lurking. >> >> I just tried this out and it fixes the auto channel bug for me. > > If that's how you're leaning and the fix is already implemented and > tested, it > seems like a no-brainer to me to slap that patch in there and run with it. That works for me. I see Ted has committed it. I looked it over just now and it looks good. Tom Breton (Tehom) |