From: Daren B. <dtb...@gm...> - 2011-05-26 04:45:54
|
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:27 AM, D. Michael McIntyre < mic...@ro...> wrote: > That makes me wonder if there isn't some Qt class that could do the same > job, > and if Qt Creator wouldn't do a better job of letting you debug that class > than an STL one. > > If there's some benefit to the swap, like better debugging, then I'd have > no > objection to switching that out. I've generally been using Qt over STL > classes in new work, while leaving old work alone unless there's a > compelling > reason to fool with it. > > Well, I just tried replacing that particular std::ofstream with a QTextStream (the best analog I could find), but the IDE still doesn't show its value when debugging. So I won't dwell on that too much. I'm still happy to have a good visual debugger. |