From: david <gn...@ha...> - 2010-06-08 18:57:50
|
Brett McCoy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:20 AM, david <gn...@ha...> wrote: >> Brent Busby wrote: >>> Anyone have any comments about the new 10.x series (QT4) Rosegarden? Is >>> it a regression, or do you think it's better? I'm talking about the >>> program itself, not the QT4 toolkit. >> I haven't used it yet. I look forward to using it. I use it for >> notation, so I'll see how that goes! >> >> I think in some cases what appears as a "regression" or "lack" in the >> program (something it used to do, but now doesn't) may well be due to >> missing stuff in QT4. I hear that KDE4's printing capabilities are >> lacking many features, compared to KDE3, because QT4's printing >> capabilities aren't as good as those of QT3. Give'em time ... > > That may be a non-issue in Rosegarden 10.x, since it uses Lilypond for > all print output now. Yah, I saw that. I've had problems printing from RG 1.7.x via Lilypond - various things RG output in Lilypond format that Lilypond just didn't like - in the past. And it always kind of seemed a little hokey - that a major program can't print on its own. ;-) But when it has printed via Lilypond, the output was superb, so I don't complain! -- David gn...@ha... authenticity, honesty, community |