Re: [Rosegarden-user] [LAU] Is it time to replant the Rosegarden?

[Brett M. <idr...@gm...>]

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:20 AM, david <gn...@ha...> wrote:
> Brent Busby wrote:
>> Anyone have any comments about the new 10.x series (QT4) Rosegarden?  Is
>> it a regression, or do you think it's better?  I'm talking about the
>> program itself, not the QT4 toolkit.
>
> I haven't used it yet. I look forward to using it. I use it for
> notation, so I'll see how that goes!
>
> I think in some cases what appears as a "regression" or "lack" in the
> program (something it used to do, but now doesn't) may well be due to
> missing stuff in QT4. I hear that KDE4's printing capabilities are
> lacking many features, compared to KDE3, because QT4's printing
> capabilities aren't as good as those of QT3. Give'em time ...

That may be a non-issue in Rosegarden 10.x, since it uses Lilypond for
all print output now.

-- Brett
------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
    If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world."
               -- Jelaleddin Rumi