Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Matrix IPB, to be or not to be?

[D. M. M. <ros...@gm...>]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Chris Cannam wrote:

> It's probably my fault as much as anyone's that we can't, although I don't
> remember for sure. 

I won't be sharp tongued enough to beat that dead horse and point out how I 
can see flat thinking in some of your earlier assumptions, but I could 
imagine this might have been you indeed.

> It is optional already, though, isn't it?  Just on by default at the
> moment.

True.

> Of course, in the qt4-graphicsview branch this is a non-issue...
> because I haven't got around to adding the IPB anyway...

Hrm.  You could just not add it and see who notices.
-- 
D. Michael McIntyre