From: Emanuel R. <xb...@we...> - 2008-09-09 20:15:50
|
2008/9/9 Julie S <msj...@ya...>: > >From my understanding, this is not necessary in every case of kapplication since QSettings can be accessed without the full QApplication file. > > ... Hi Julie You may be right that the <QApplication> headers may not be required as often as <kapplication> was. While qApp->config() should be replaced with a direct call to QSettings, as you mentioned, still there are some qApp calls (formerly kapp), which still require <QApplication>, like qApp->palette() We may try later, when we got rid of most remaining errors, to remove QApplication includes, in order to see where they are really required. Sincerely Emanuel |