Re: [Rosegarden-user] New track transpose behavior in SVN

[Arnout E. <ros...@bz...>]

Hm, seems that SVN mail didn't come though, and I'm too lazy to go look at 
the history manually ;).

So for a track with transposition -2, we have:
A> play in C, hear in C,  see in C, hear in Bb when played back
B> play in C, hear in Bb, see in C, hear in Bb when played back
C> play in C, hear in C,  see in D, hear in C when played back

So we used to have A, once considered B and now have C?

Sounds like a huge improvement to me. It's hard to decide between B and
C, both seem to make sense in different ways :)


Arnout