From: nilitonilito n. <nil...@ho...> - 2007-02-04 22:25:19
|
>We had that 10 years ago with Rosegarden 2.1, and it was a failure in that >nobody ever used it. Then again at the time RG probably had a much smaller >audience than now, and the language itself could certainly be improved. It is indeed not for the everyday use, but still, I remember having a lot of fun using the script language of cakewalk, and there were several scripts shipped with the product doing already interesting things, like midi delay with feedback and modified pitch. >The subject comes up from time to time, and the main problem is still that >we >can't figure out what such a language would actually do. This is indeed an open question and I certainly do not have the answer, recently the same question came up in the muse mailing list. Among others, Python was suggested as a good candidate. >I don't think we'll >be able to build this language until we see a good use case for it (like an >hypothetical script which would actually do something interesting, for >instance). The harmonisation plugin would surely be a good case. Cheers Nil >Guillaume. >http://telegraph-road.org > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >easier. >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Rosegarden-devel mailing list >Ros...@li... - use the link below to unsubscribe >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel _________________________________________________________________ Personnalisez votre Messenger avec Live.com http://www.windowslive.fr/livecom/ |