From: D. M. 'S. M. <ros...@gm...> - 2006-06-16 17:32:04
|
On Friday 16 June 2006 12:46 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > OK, I've attempted to make it do that. Please test! It hasn't had much > testing yet, and it's not unlikely that I've just broken the entire > feature, so all feedback welcome. Haven't tested yet, but one quick thought. 1....2....3....4....5....6.... |###||:::||:::||:::||:::||###| # = real : = repeat Range from 3 to 5. Range copy. Paste at 4. What happens now? Seems like what I'm expecting to actually happen should be a copy of segment 3-4 pasted at 4, and since it's a whole fragment, it should repeat. Yielding 1....2....3....4....5....6....7....8.... |###||:::||:::||###||:::||???||???||###| ? = unknown Does the segment at 6-7, formerly a repeat of segment 1-2, now also become a real segment, with one repeat? Does 6-8 become a void now that the tail has been cut off the head repeating segment back at 1-2? Or does Rosegarden crash at this point in hopeless confusion? I need to look into the answer to these questions and see if I like the behavior. I'm afraid I'm going to find this is something else that needs special treatment somehow, but I won't know until I look at a real scenario. Which I will do right after I get my sorry ass out of this chair, and out the door right now. I've kept them waiting too long as it is. -- D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre ---- Silvan <dmm...@us...> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ |