Re: [Rosegarden-devel] SVN borked, or bad checkout, or what?

[Chris C. <ca...@al...>]

On Friday 24 Feb 2006 10:48, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> I was thinking the same. The 'rosegarden' module was defined only as a
> band-aid over our initial cvs import goofs, which we can now fix through
> svn moves.

You want to handle that one?

> >  - commit reports to the bugs list, with diffs (I rely heavily on these
> > in tracking for branch management and will certainly continue to do so)
>
> It would be surprising that sforge hadn't provided the same kind of
> scripts they have for cvs for svn, I'll investigate.

They have, I've enabled it.  Don't know whether it works or not yet though.

> Described here : https://sourceforge.net/docs/E09/#backup. I just
> checked that it works (261Mb folks...).

Ugh, five times the size of the CVS tarball -- I guess that's an uncompressed 
Subversion tree?  I'll have a go too.  rsync makes more sense in the long 
run, I guess.


Chris