From: Richard B. <ric...@fe...> - 2004-03-02 17:26:03
|
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 10:28, Chris Cannam wrote: > Anyway, other than that, I have nothing against suggesting some > alternatives for the icon, which was never the best in the first > place. But they should be discussed here, not just applied at > random. No they shouldn't - and I don't like the new one. Can we revert or at least just be consistent? There's an army of these things now and they'll getting confusing. I'll gladly start by dumping the stupid RG-tux. R |