From: Mark H. <ma...@li...> - 2003-05-18 16:42:23
|
On Sun, 18, May, 2003 at 04:17:17PM +0000, Chris Cannam spoke thus.. > On Saturday 17 May 2003 1:59 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > Given that your patch is already committed, incremental would be > > better. > > The last patch sent to the list is not committed yet, I think? So a > replacement for that would probably be the thing, i.e. a diff against > current CVS. Yeah. That's the question I was asking. This is a replacement to the previous patch (i.e. it applies directly to CVS as it is now). Patch attached, Mark -- Mark Hymers <markh at linuxfromscratch dot org> "Irish police are being handicapped in a search for a stolen van, because they cannot issue a description. It's a special branch vehicle, and they don't want the public to know what it looks like." The Guardian |