From: SlowPic <sl...@we...> - 2005-03-09 12:00:48
|
Hi fellows, I still hope to get some support with this topic: Isn't there any other way to enter dotted notes as this (eg. dotted 8th "c"): * press 8 on PC keyboard * enter "c" on MIDI keyboard * press <Ctrl>+<.> on PC keyboard * press < -> > on PC keyboard Why isn't there such a simple thing like switching between dotted and undotted notation with a simple <c><.> for single dots and maybe <c><:> for double dots? The worst thing here is, that an additional < -> > (cursor right) is obligate to re-procede the input cursor. IMO, a simple switch "dot-on/dot-off" would be of great help .... similar to chord mode or triplet mode. Great wish #1 ------------- Implement <.> and <:> as hotkeys to toggle dotted notation in a way similar to chord mode and triplet mode. Example: Think of "dah" as a dottd 8th and "di" as a normal 8th. I have to enter some 20 measures going dah di dah di dah di dah <rest> dah di dah di ... You got the point ;) Rests ----- Concerning rests: No luck with rest input, here. I can toggle *once* from normal note input to rest input by pressing <T> *but* no keypress whatsoever helps to get back to note input. I have to use the mouse and the notes toolbar for this. This is the case when eg. entering a 4th rests and I try to enter a 4th note afterwards. If instead I try to enter a note of different duration, it works, ie. the input is switched back from rest mode to note mode. Start with note input mode and try this: * press <4> followed by <t> * next tone on the MIDI keyboard will be a 4th rests * press <y> to switch back * enter next note -> a *rest* appears * same behaviour with <p> instead Additionally: If, while in rest mode, I press the <y> key alone, it inserts a rest! This should not be the case. Great wish #2 ------------- Implement <p> or <r> as hotkeys to toggle rest mode on or of in a way similar to chord mode and triplet mode. These two "great wishes" would be much more intuitive and consequent in use. Within the code an additional switch (true/false) needs to be implemented and I think the code would get clearer this way. |