Re: [Resteasy-developers] Resteasy-developers Digest, Vol 4, Issue 16

[Olivier <ol...@mu...>]

Ryan, Bill,

If I do the Android client part, the amount of library dependency MUST 
be as minimal as possible, if not a new project would have to be 
started. To bad android has not based their architecture on OSGi, that 
may have hlped to use existing packages...

Olivier

res...@li... wrote:
> Send Resteasy-developers mailing list submissions to
> 	res...@li...
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	res...@li...
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	res...@li...
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Resteasy-developers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Proposed Project Restructuring (Bill Burke)
>    2. Re: Proposed Project Restructuring (Ryan J. McDonough)
>    3. Re: Coding conventions (Ryan J. McDonough)
>    4. Re: CHANGES COMING: I'm scheduling a package	name change
>       (Ryan J. McDonough)
>    5. License? (Bill Burke)
>    6. Martin Algesten commit access (Bill Burke)
>    7. Mock cleanup and new Mock mini-framework (Bill Burke)
>    8. Contributor page and code of conduct (Bill Burke)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:44:43 -0400
> From: Bill Burke <bb...@re...>
> Subject: Re: [Resteasy-developers] Proposed Project Restructuring
> To: "Ryan J. McDonough" <ry...@da...>
> Cc: res...@li...
> Message-ID: <486...@re...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
>
> Ryan J. McDonough wrote:
>   
>> Looking at some of the threads on this list regarding the client API, I 
>> think maybe a good time to alter the project layout slightly. What I'd 
>> like to propose is the following:
>>
>>     * Separate out the client code into a new sub-project called
>>       resteasy-client
>>     * Move code that is shared between the server API and client API
>>       into resteasy-common.
>>     
>
> You don't think this project is too small for so many separate 
> projects/jars?  The client API is actually only a few classes compared 
> to the server-side stuff.  I don't know...  If Olivier is going to do 
> the Android stuff, then he probably wants things as small as possible.
>
> We should probably move the client stuff to a different packaging format 
> as well:
>
> org.jboss.resteasy.client
> org.jboss.resteasy.client.spi
> org.jboss.resteasy.client.httpclient
> org.jboss.resteasy.client.android
>
>
>   
>>     * Remove distribution project and moving the distribution details
>>       into the root pom.xml.
>>     
>
> If you have a better way +1.  I had problems putting distribution info 
> within pom.xml.  Would also be very cool if you could figure out how I 
> can generate javadocs to go in the distribution.  Now I have to do 
> multiple steps.
>
>
>   
>>     * Rename "jboss-integration-testing" to "integrations" and have it
>>       associated with the root pom.xml
>>     
>
> I don't want integration testing running with the root pom.  Most of the 
> time, I have no need to run JBoss unit tests.
>
>   
>>     * Refactor the package name from org.resteasy to org.jboss.resteasy.
>>     
>
> +1 on package rename.  This is very easy in Intellij so I'll get to this.
>
>
> Bill
>
>