From: Dan N. <dan...@gm...> - 2013-12-14 17:37:55
|
Thanks, this is a nice feature! The approach you are taking looks sound. So, there is a problem with licensing and copyrights. The re2c code is in the public domain, and the utf8.{h,c} code you use is copyrighted with a MIT style license. If we add that code to re2c, then there is a mix and things get messy. Do you think you could re-write the utf8 code (it isn't very much) and place it in the public domain? Second, as a general rule, we try to have as much test coverage as is reasonable. Could you add some tests? Third, I am not picky about code formatting, but I do prefer it to be consistent within a code base and when evaluating changes, formatting changes are distracting. I'd appreciate it if you avoid making formatting changes of unrelated code in patches. Last of all, I recently moved the code to git. I don't mind looking at patches, but git forks and pull requests are easier to deal with. If you are familiar with git, do you mind using that instead of a patch? Although if you don't know git, I don't mind if you send a patch. On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Ulya Fokanova <skv...@gm...> wrote: > Sorry, forgot the patch itself. > > Ulya > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > re2c-devel mailing list > re2...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/re2c-devel > > |