From: Craig R.H. <cr...@de...> - 2002-07-26 21:26:52
|
Worth noting we disabled auto-reporting in spamassassin because we there also believe that SpamNet/Razor should be for human-identified spam and not just be a repository of heuristically identified messages. If you can identify a message with heuristics, then so could any other person running a spam filter. Having said that, if you *did* auto-report stuff which SA identifies as spam, then once/if the trust stuff works/is turned on in Razor2, and if you're auto-submitting through a dedicated Razor ID, then that ID should build up a trust profile which makes it OK to auto-submit... Is that not right Jordan/Vipul? C On Friday, July 26, 2002, at 09:39 AM, Jordan Ritter wrote: > My perspective is that Razor/SpamNet is a network of human-based > determinations. While there are a few high-quality spamtraps pointed > at the network (who remain the exception), in general I discourage the > behaviour you describe because the network is not meant to be a > centralized cache of automated reports -- that's not what > Razor/SpamNet is about. For better or worse, only human beings should > be submitting SPAM to the network. > > Granted, some folks have implemented what you describe, but have the > additional step of reviewing their automated systems' determinations > before submission. In this case, I think that's fine. > > > --jordan > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 09:25:33AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > # OK - I just joing the list and want to know if I'm doing > things right. > # I'm using Spam Assassin and I'm now on the developers team > writing a lot > # of the new body test rules for SA. > # > # Here's my question - just to see if I understand this right. > I want to > # start reporting spam and want to be accurate. If I use spam > assassin to > # test messages that are say 25 point scores (very very high > confidence) > # and are not flagged as in the razor list already, can I pipe these > # messages to razor-report to automate reporting of very high > spam? At 25 > # points and using the latest rule set a score of 25 is 100% accurate. > # > # > # > # > # ------------------------------------------------------- > # This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > # Welcome to geek heaven. > # http://thinkgeek.com/sf > # _______________________________________________ > # Razor-users mailing list > # Raz...@li... > # https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users > |