Re: [Razor-users] New Guy - Razor Questions

[Jordan R. <jp...@da...>]

My perspective is that Razor/SpamNet is a network of human-based
determinations.  While there are a few high-quality spamtraps pointed
at the network (who remain the exception), in general I discourage the
behaviour you describe because the network is not meant to be a
centralized cache of automated reports -- that's not what
Razor/SpamNet is about.  For better or worse, only human beings should
be submitting SPAM to the network.

Granted, some folks have implemented what you describe, but have the
additional step of reviewing their automated systems' determinations
before submission.  In this case, I think that's fine.


--jordan

On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 09:25:33AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
# OK - I just joing the list and want to know if I'm doing things right.=20
# I'm using Spam Assassin and I'm now on the developers team writing a lot=
=20
# of the new body test rules for SA.
#=20
# Here's my question - just to see if I understand this right. I want to=20
# start reporting spam and want to be accurate. If I use spam assassin to=
=20
# test messages that are say 25 point scores (very very high confidence)=20
# and are not flagged as in the razor list already, can I pipe these=20
# messages to razor-report to automate reporting of very high spam? At 25=
=20
# points and using the latest rule set a score of 25 is 100% accurate.
#=20
#=20
#=20
#=20
# -------------------------------------------------------
# This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
# Welcome to geek heaven.
# http://thinkgeek.com/sf
# _______________________________________________
# Razor-users mailing list
# Raz...@li...
# https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users