From: <co...@gm...> - 2005-02-04 07:31:32
|
Hi, Evan: Weirdly enough, your last message and the one titled [Forgot to attach files] have been categorized as spam on GMail... just as a side note. Greets Luis Alberto On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:56:40 -0500, Evan Prodromou <ev...@ba...> wrote= : > On Thu, 2005-03-02 at 17:53 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:=20 > It looks like razor has any URLs pointing to bad.dynu.ca listed as > spamvertized URLs. And the mailman list is adding that URL in the footer. > Weird. Well, I'm pretty sure I'm the only person on this list who uses > Razor, so I'm going to guess I must have accidentally razor-report'd a > message.=20 > You can tell it's one of the two URLs in the message because the signatu= re > matching is e8. e8 is whiplash, which is a hash of a URL, and mostly focu= ses > on the domain of the link. I'm sure someone smarter than me has a good > reason that that's a good idea. I have a hard time believing that big ema= il > providers like Yahoo! and Topica aren't going to be blacklisted real soon= ... > Since it's the first e8, I assume it's the first URL in the body. Which > would be the one to bad.dynu.ca. Yeah, a dummy message with just the > bad.dynu.ca URL tests as "known spam". Actually... ah, anything with > .dynu.ca tests negative. .dynu.ca is a dynamic hostname service: > =20 > http://dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Internet/Servers/Address_Management/Dy= namic_DNS_Services/ > =20 > =20 > Issue some razor-revokes and it should clear up. It didn't. Grrr. I took > the footer URL=20 > This is not a good trend for razor. Not good at all. The addition of e8 = has > boosted razor's hit rate substantially, but it's causing some really odd = FPs > too. No, it's not a good trend. I'm strongly reminded of overzealous RBLe= rs > who blacklist big blocks of IPs to hide one or two bad apples. > =20 > ~Evan > =20 > =20 > -- Evan Prodromou .O. http://bad.dynu.ca/~evan/ .= .O > ev...@ba... OOO=20 --=20 Luis Alberto Pab=F3n Flores copong.NOSP@M.gmail.com |