[Rainbowportal-devel] The Rainbow user?
Brought to you by:
danijel_kecman,
manudea
From: HolonCom S. <su...@ho...> - 2004-10-26 10:49:35
|
The discussion about old themes made me think: Who is the Rainbow user? Does makes portals for customers or only for personal use? Does he use a seperate databases for each portal? Does he reuse the code for his portals or does every client gets his own copy of the .net code? Does he use the default Rainbow portals? Does he design his own layouts? Does he design his own themes? Does he use Windows Authentication? It's a more elaborate Rainbow User survey as the one currently on the site (http://www.rainbowportal.net/portal/tabID__3361/DesktopDefault.aspx) Knowing your audiance is the basis for making good decisions and serene discussions afterwards. Greetz Rob graziano poretti wrote: >Hi to all >briefly ... Ed has been significantly contributing to the Rainbow >since long time, Charles has contributed significantly to the project >in the last months, so ... in my opinion, does it make sense that >persons like u (both) are wasting ur time in (sometimes supposed) >personal attacks? >Guys ... thnx to the contribution of the whole community Rainbow is >flying. Ed is absolutely great and Charles (in my opinion) uses >particular dress for his ideas, but we are adult enough to evalutate >ideas under the dress .. and ideas are often great, so .... i really >hope to read other words here from people who shares the same >project... suggestions and critics are always welcome, as usual and as >they have always been in this community. >thnx to both >Graziano > > >On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:22:08 +0200, Emmanuele De Andreis ><ma...@gm...> wrote: > > >>>Charles Carroll's opinion >>> >>> >>Of course it is... as your is Ed opinion (every message is signed... >>no misunderstood). >>I have already asked to avoid personal attack (or something that one >>can consider like this). >>Ed: if you disagree on what Charles says please reply explaining your >>opinion (this is what is supposed to be a mailing list). >>At same time Charles, please avoid terms offensive (or that people can >>be perceived offensive), saying the truth shouting has no more value >>than saying politely. >>Everybody has some part of truth and this list is for sharing this >>truth with others so we can have, all together, the whole truth. >> >>Manu >>(list moderator) >> >> >> >>On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:48:19 +0100, Ed Daniel <ra...@es...> wrote: >> >> >>>"and makes them feel like the Rainbow team cannot be trusted to support >>>things that they supply the admin." >>> >>>"whatever past decision process allowed this kind of cruelty to be >>>acceptable needs to vanish as a style of thinking." >>> >>>Please note this is Charles Carroll's opinion and this should not be taken >>>to represent any Rainbow users other than Charles. For those reading this >>>list regularly you will be aware we are happy to listen but not when it >>>could be considered irrational and offensive use of language. >>> >>> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal >>Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us >>Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more >>http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl >>_______________________________________________ >>Rainbowportal-devel mailing list >>Rai...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rainbowportal-devel >> >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal >Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us >Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl >_______________________________________________ >Rainbowportal-devel mailing list >Rai...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rainbowportal-devel > > |