Re: [Rainbowportal-devel] open source text editor

[Cory I. <cis...@ya...>]

StyleSheets can easily be added to ActiveUp, but making FTB the default is
probably the best option right now.

Cory Isakson

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mario Hartmann" <Mario@Hartmann.net>
To: "Mark McFarlane" <mar...@ho...>; <cis...@ya...>;
<ric...@fl...>; <rai...@li...>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject: AW: [Rainbowportal-devel] open source text editor


yes.
the FreeTextBox seems to be really great, and it is free.
everytime i add a module i have to change the editor to use FreeTextBox
not ActiveUp.

btw. the FreeTextBox supports stylesheet, thats something we could
implement.
mario

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rai...@li...
[mailto:rai...@li...]Im Auftrag von
Mark McFarlane
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. September 2003 16:04
An: cis...@ya...; ric...@fl...;
rai...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Rainbowportal-devel] open source text editor


Should we make FreeTextBox the default editor for new Rainbow
installations
so that new users don't inadvertently deploy a commercial add-in that
requires licensing.

Mark

>From: Cory Isakson <cis...@ya...>
>Reply-To: cis...@ya...
>To: Rick N Burdeniuk <ric...@fl...>,
>rai...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Rainbowportal-devel] open source text editor
>Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
>
>The FreeTextBox from RevJon (http://www.revjon.com/ftb/) is probalby
one of
>the best choices for alternatives.  It is already incorporated in to
>Rainbow as 1 of the options.  It is also the editor used by DNN.  I
have no
>problem removing ActiveUp editor as long as we continue to support the
>ability to plug in any editor that a company might own.
>
>Cory
>
>Rick N Burdeniuk <ric...@fl...> wrote:
>Is anyone actively working on replacing ActiveUP's "not for commercial
use"
>editor? I saw an earlier email from Emmanuele talking about a possible
>switch, and on the forum John Mandia suggested some "custom editing"
was
>possible, but shouldn't we be moving towards using a free editor by
>default?
>
>I realize I may not fully understand the requirements, but why would
>something like the FCK editor under the lesser GPL inappropriate?
>https://sourceforge.net/projects/fckeditor/
>http://www.fredck.com/FCKeditor/Demo/
>
>Curiously yours,
>Rick
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Rainbowportal-devel mailing list
>Rai...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rainbowportal-devel
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

_________________________________________________________________
Compare Cable, DSL or Satellite plans: As low as $29.95.
https://broadband.msn.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Rainbowportal-devel mailing list
Rai...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rainbowportal-devel