RE: [Rainbowportal-documents] RE:Overhaul of installation document
Brought to you by:
danijel_kecman,
manudea
From: Mark M. <mar...@ar...> - 2004-12-27 04:25:36
|
There is a fair amount of overlap between your three scenarios, but I think with a bit of organization you can minimize content replication. The consumer one is most important today in my mind. Mark -----Original Message----- From: rai...@li... [mailto:rai...@li...] On Behalf Of Daniela Nii Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 5:13 AM To: rai...@li... Subject: [Rainbowportal-documents] RE:Overhaul of installation document Mark wrote: "Also, I suspect there are either new steps or unnecessary steps since this doc was first created 20 months ago." Mark, I agree with you. One can see that quite a few things have been added or supercede info that is listed there. The time has come to give it a shake down. :) I was playing around with the idea of addressing three distinct installation scenarios: 1) consumer: user who wants to use official release and add-ins, 2) developer: user who wants to use the CVS build(s) to modify and expand the functionality, and 3) hosted: installing the Rainbow Portal with a third party service provider What do you think? Or did I miss something? Daniela ______________________________________________________________ "It is with logic that we prove, but by intuition that we discover" (Henri Poincare) ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Rainbowportal-documents mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rainbowportal-documents |