[Quickfixj-users] Repeating group working in QFJ 1.4.0 but not 1.5.0?

[Nathan S. <nat...@gm...>]

Hi all,

  I have a bit of code that works fine using QFJ 1.4.0, but upgrading
to QFJ 1.5.0 results in an exception on the same message on the
acceptor side.

  ...
   quickfix.fix44.NewOrderSingle nosmsg =
(quickfix.fix44.NewOrderSingle) message;
   NoPartyIDs nprs = new NoPartyIDs();
   nosmsg.get(nprs);
   LOGGER.debug("Found NoPartyIDs: "+nprs.getValue());
   if(nprs.getValue() != 1) throw new IncorrectTagValue("Must have one
party id repeating group");
   quickfix.fix44.NewOrderSingle.NoPartyIDs group = new
quickfix.fix44.NewOrderSingle.NoPartyIDs();
   nosmsg.getGroup(1,group);
   PartyID partyID = group.get(new PartyID());
   ...

  The session is configured with DataDictionary=/path/to/FIX44.xml
(the QFJ-provided version from the fix44 jar) and UseDataDictionary=Y
on both the initatior and the acceptor.

QFJ Message log for the message in question:
8=FIX.4.4 9=195 35=D 34=5 49=test 52=20110622-16:53:43.621 56=SERVER
115=449 116=449 1=1 11=S5H29345UFL2Y97 38=1000000 40=1 44=0 54=1
55=EURUSD 60=20110622-12:53:43 100=1:501 207=501 453=1 448=449 447=1
452=3 10=243

QFJ Event log shows:
20110622-16:53:46: Rejecting invalid message: quickfix.FieldNotFound:
453, index=1: 8=FIX.4.4 9=195 35=D 34=5 49=test
52=20110622-16:53:43.621 56=SERVER 115=449 116=449 1=1
11=S5H29345UFL2Y97 38=1000000 40=1 44=0 54=1 55=EURUSD
60=20110622-12:53:43 100=1:501 207=501 447=1 448=449 452=3 453=0
10=242
20110622-16:53:46: Reject sent for Message 5: Conditionally Required
Field Missing

Acceptor debug log shows:
2011-06-22 12:53:46,016 DEBUG
[com.tradedesksoftware.ets.clientadapter.fix.MessageConverter44] (QF/J
Session dispatcher: FIX.4.4:SERVER->test) Found NoPartyIDs: 1
2011-06-22 12:53:46,016 INFO
[com.tradedesksoftware.ets.clientadapter.fix.MessageConverter44] (QF/J
Session dispatcher: FIX.4.4:SERVER->test) FIELD WAS NOT FOUND IN
createOrder44: quickfix.FieldNotFound: 453, index=1
        at quickfix.FieldMap.getGroup(FieldMap.java:684) [:1.5.0]
...

  Any ideas why the upgrade might break this repeating group?  If I
switch the QFJ jars back to QFJ 1.4.0, everything works beautifully.

Thanks for the help,

Nathan