Re: [Quickfix-users] Schema definitions for the datadictionaries?

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Yes, these were in fact derived from parsing the .html and .doc files.  
This was somewhat error prone so the conversion wasn't perfect.  We 
mostly correct mistakes as they are reported.  This was all done well 
before such a thing as the fix repository existed.

We will be switching to using the repository to generate our 
dictionaries.  There currently is no schema for our dictionary format.

--oren

Erik van Zijst wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: 
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hi,
>
> The page at http://www.quickfixengine.org/xml.html shows the xml data 
> dictionaries that were derived from the fix specification.
>
> I noticed that, in contrast to the official fixprotocol fixml schemas, 
> your files do include all repeating group count tags (e.g. 
> NoUnderlyings - 711). Where is this information coming from? Where did 
> the quickfix parser got this information from? It didn't harvest the 
> .doc or .pdf files, now did it?
>
> Additionally I'd like to know if there is an xmlschema definition for 
> these data dictionary files. I can't find it online.
>
> cheers,
> Erik
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting 
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding 
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>
>