From: Andre W. <wo...@us...> - 2004-12-21 06:34:29
|
Hi, On 17.12.04, Gert Ingold wrote: > > I'm currious. I've never had any problems without this second run. Did > > I constantly missed something? > > well, if you look at the documentation, you will notice that on page 3 > there is a reference which needs a second pdflatex run. So, Michael is > right in adding one more run. On the other hand: who really wants to > read my documentation of the glifaq code? I've just seen the checkin and somehow I thought it was all about executing the glifaq.ins file, where I would wonder why it should be run multiple times. Now I've got it that we're talking about the creation of the style documentation here. Sure this style doc is very valueable (I would even call the faq style the most beta-like part of PyX ;-) -- lets see whether at some point this gets used in another project ...) and sure it should be processed twice. Just my fault to not carefully looking at it from the very beginning ... André -- by _ _ _ Dr. André Wobst / \ \ / ) wo...@us..., http://www.wobsta.de/ / _ \ \/\/ / PyX - High quality PostScript figures with Python & TeX (_/ \_)_/\_/ visit http://pyx.sourceforge.net/ |