[pywin32-bugs] [ pywin32-Patches-1305342 ] LocalService support

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #1305342, was opened at 2005-09-27 09:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=1305342&group_id=78018

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Dubner (dubnerm)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: LocalService support

Initial Comment:
With this module you can create out-of-process COM
server in NT Service.

Usage:

   class MyCOMObject1:
     _reg_clsid_ = ...
     _reg_...

   class MyCOMService(localservice.LocalCOMService):  
                 
     _svc_com_servers_ = [MyCOMObject1, ...]          
                 

   if __name__=='__main__':
     localservice.ProcessCommandLine(MyCOMService)    
                 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2006-07-12 22:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Just checking if this is still alive...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2005-10-11 11:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks Michael.  A few comments:

* Could you please change 'Granted for inclusion in pywin32
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/pywin32/).' to something
like 'Released under the terms of the pywin32 license' or
something - that makes it clear that people who are
currently free to redistribute pywin32 components are also
free to redistribute this.

* Is there any reason we can't leverage the existing service
command-line support?  It seems a shame to clone so much
code.  I'd be willing to consider changing win32serviceutil
so we can take advantage of customized command-line options
etc.  The 'optparse' module is a better choice than getopt
these days.

* Its not clear why 'serve' is needed, and there aren't any
comments for it.

* Why are InitHook() functions rather than just class members?

Thanks,

Mark

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Dubner (dubnerm)
Date: 2005-09-27 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39274

Sorry - forgot to click on checkbox

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2005-09-27 11:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Did you mean to include an attachment?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=1305342&group_id=78018