Re: [Pyode-user] The Pyrex version is ready to be checked in

[Bernie R. <br...@ec...>]

I'm in a rush today (spending time with family), so this will be brief...

First off -- great work, Matthias!  It sounds like things will be much 
easier to maintain now.

Yes, I had originally started adding the setData() routines before I 
noticed how you had done things.  I went back and removed the routines I'd 
added, but I must have missed one.  Thanks for catching it!   :-)

I like your proposed organization of the repository.  I would suggest 
moving the code that's there now into something like "pyode_previous" and 
making the Pyrex version the "pyode" one (with perhaps a readme.txt file 
explaining things).

As to licensing, I think it makes sense to use the exact same licensing as 
ODE itself.  Being more restrictive would just make it less likely for 
people to use PyODE, and being less restrictive is pointless (since PyODE 
won't work without ODE).

Anyway, I'm off... will try to check my email later...


At 04:32 PM 6/27/2004 +0200, Matthias Baas wrote:
>[...]
>
>Now how should we organize the cvs repository? Currently I have a main 
>directory where the setup script is and a subdirectory "src" where the 
>.pyx files are. My tutorial source files (which serve as a "regression 
>test" right now) are in a subdirectory "examples". So shall I commit 
>everything into a new top level directory "pyode2" or would you rather 
>like to reuse the current pyode directory?
>
>By the way, what license are we using? GPL? BSD? Or both (as ODE is doing)?
>
>- Matthias -

--
   Bernie Roehl
   University of Waterloo Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering
   Mail: br...@ec...   Voice: (519) 888-4567 x 2607 [work]
   URL: http://ece.uwaterloo.ca/~broehl