Re: [PyMOL] Re: PyMOL-users digest, Vol 1 #408 - 11 msgs

[Daniel R. <dr...@li...>]

Hi Alan

Thanks for the tip!  Taking the tar route rather than the rpm one makes
installation trivial on Mandrake 9.1.  I'm even more impressed to see
that PYMOL automatically detects both processors so rendering is just
phenomenally fast.

Cheers

Dan

On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 20:48, al...@la... wrote:
> Hi List!
> 
> I'm glad to see others enjoying MDK 9.1.
> 
> But pymol rpm for RH is a friend of MDK, I suggest you use
> pymol-0_90-bin-linux-libc6-i386.tgz
> 
> It works terrifically for me.
> 
> Dear Warren, realy great job!
> If possible, a proper pymol rpm for MDK 9.1 would be very welcome, since I
> believe there's many MDK users of pymol like me and Dan.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Alan Silvae
> 
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Warren L. DeLano wrote:
> 
>  > Dan,
>  >
>  >         Opinions may vary, but I see RPMs are pretty heavily tied to the
>  > distribution.  The kind of errors you're seeing are to be expected when
>  > trying to install cross-distribution.
>  >
>  >         RPM doesn't look at the file system (AFAIK), it looks in the RPM
>  > database for the names of (Redhat-specific) known dependency packages.
>  >
>  >         You also need the Python megawidgets (pmw) -- there should be an
>  > RPM for this...
>  >
>  >         How many other PyMOL users are using Mandrake?  Perhaps there
>  > are enough users to justify at least one official mdk package release?
>  >
>  > Cheers,
>  > Warren
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list
> PyM...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users