Re: [pygccxml-development] pyplusplus status
Brought to you by:
mbaas,
roman_yakovenko
From: Roman Y. <rom...@gm...> - 2006-07-28 21:13:41
|
On 7/26/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote: > I think we are intermingling two separate questions that, in my opinion, > should be treated independently: > > (1) Is it reasonable/useful/desirable/cool to have a pyplusplus related > wiki where *users* can add any information they deem useful when dealing > with pyplusplus? > > (2) Should the above wiki also be used as the primary source for the > official pyplusplus documentation? > > My previous answer to Allen's posting was dealing with the first > question and I'm still in favor of such a wiki. > As to the second question, that's entirely up to Roman as this > influences the way he creates the documentation. If he doesn't feel > comfortable with using the wiki for the official documentation, then I > accept that and it's no problem with me. But if the answer to the second > question from above is "no" then I don't see why the answer to the first > question also has to be "no". I agree with you. > > Basically, I agree with all points that Allen has made. The main > advantages of a wiki for me are the following: I understand those points. I'd like that all contribution to the wiki will be done under boost license. I want to take all good thing from the wiki to py++. > > pyplusplus still does not have community :-(. It does have users, but not > > community. > > >>> users==community > True > > See? :) :-) yes. > So the bottom line is that I would answer my initial question (1) with > "yes, definitely" and leave the answer of question (2) up to Roman > (which he has already answered with "no"). I agree with Matthias -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ |