Re: [Psyco-devel] License

[Michael H. <mw...@py...>]

Armin Rigo <ar...@tu...> writes:

> I am about to re-license Psyco.  I am considering using the MIT License
> for its simplicity, but one might argue that the Python License itself
> would be a better fit.  It seems however that the latter (in either the
> old CNRI version or by the Python Software Foundation) is explicitely
> written as an agreement between the CNRI or PSF and the user, which is not
> the case for Psyco.  Besides, the minimalistic MIT License suits me more. 
> Any comments?

The "old" Python license -- i.e. the CWI one -- is pretty similar to
the MIT License.  I like it.

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple,
  neat, and wrong.                                    -- H. L. Mencken