Re: [Protomol-users] Need quick Feedback on lapack libraries in CVS

[Paul R B. <pbr...@nd...>]

I agree.  I'll look into the best fall back options.  Scott already setup
configure.in to search for machine native lapack libraries.  I think the
function calls currently in the source are specific to slight modifications to
the API specific to SimTKlapack.  I'll check on this and resolve conflicts.

Most of the linux distributions seem to have some version of lapack in place. 
For Windows I'll do some looking.  I sent an email to the SimTKlapack fellows
regarding the availability of some static libraries and if they are willing to
oblige they will be the recommended for Windows and Unix however not included
with the ProtoMol source.

--
Paul R Brenner, P.E.
Computer Science and Engineering
The University of Notre Dame

"Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid; humans are incredibly
slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond imagination."
-Albert Einstein


Quoting Jesus Izaguirre <iza...@st...>:

> fine with me - this is probably best
> Quoting Thierry Matthey <tm...@sc...>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I support 100% Scott. Do it like FFTW, no include, but configure with
> > fall back.
> >
> > -Thierry
> >
>
>
>