From: Matthew C. <mat...@gm...> - 2011-10-27 18:19:30
|
On 10/27/2011 12:56 PM, Brendan MacLean wrote: > Better still would be the TeamCity setup that rejects your commit > if it fails anything. So that your changes are not actually committed, but you get full test feedback. That would be nice in a way but that would be a potentially long delay on the commit if the build agents are backlogged. > Just so much one can get done in a day. Yes, there is room to improve in this area. I would prefer > to head in a direction that did not involve increased long-term project overhead. If, however, you > can muster the funding for getting Trey to set up TC on another branch, and want to be the person > managing such a branch, I don't really see a problem, since it would essentially be invisible to > everyone not explicitly interested in it. It is trivial to create a TC project and move build configurations from one project to another. -Matt |