Re: [Prex-devel] Prex git tree available
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kohtani
From: Andrew D. <and...@gm...> - 2009-06-24 23:17:17
|
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:17 PM, David Given<dg...@co...> wrote: > > I use it a little, mostly for personal filesystem repositories for > keeping track of changes to arbitrary directories, and while I like its > speed and flexibility I do find that it doesn't really work the way I > want to work. My workflow usually goes: > > 1. checkout > 2. work on branch > 3. check diffs against HEAD > 4. individually revert changes I don't want > 5. individually commit changes I do want > 6. repeat from 4 until done > > Step 3 is awkward because git doesn't like diffing against the working > copy, and wants me to stage the changes first. But if I do that, step 4 > becomes rather difficult. Interesting - I use almost exactly the same workflow. Git can diff in may ways, index to HEAD, HEAD to working copy, etc. We must be using it slightly differently because I find it does this type of stuff very well. > It doesn't help that the git Eclipse plugin is still rather broken. > Eclipse's SVN plugin is fantastic. I like being able to point at a file, > ask it what's changed, then point at an individual change in the file > and say, revert that. I use the native command line tools and qgit for tree visualisation. I have recently started looking at Eclipse again but Egit doesn't sound very interesting yet. > </grumble> :) > [...] >> Oops. This is because I broke convention and haven't pushed up a >> "master" branch yet. This fixes it: > > Yup, works fine. Ta! Good to hear. Andrew |