Re: [Prevayler-discussion] Implementation PrevaylerEight
Brought to you by:
jsampson,
klauswuestefeld
From: Marcel O. <mar...@gm...> - 2014-10-24 09:53:17
|
Hiya, >And the exceptions still arose? Nope, in that case, no more exceptions, but then I had the incredible steep decline in performance. Best, Marcel On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Christian Stein <sor...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Marcel Oerlemans < > mar...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hiya, >> >> Yes, I did. I forgot to include those results, here they are: >> > > And the exceptions still arose? > > >> 32077,44 transactions/second @ 1 thread >> 6836,89 transactions/second @ 2 threads >> 547,94 transactions/second @ 3 threads >> 30,33 transactions/second @ 4 threads >> >> On the other hand, when I run your BenchConcurrent test, I got a peak >> of 1712415 transactions per second for P8. Which is incredible! >> >> > This puzzles me, too. Both. The steep decline of performance in the > Scalability test shipping with Prevayler and the heap of transactions that > P8 handles in a simple "do a fast as you can" scenario. > > May be Klaus et al can elaborate this behaviour. > > Cheers, > Christian > > Btw. here http://www.chartgo.com/share.do?id=67c65287aa I'm charting my > current results. It's a nice online charting tool with a simple "GET" > interface. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe go to the end of this page: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prevayler-discussion > _______________________________________________ > "Databases in Memoriam" -- http://www.prevayler.org > > |