Re: powertweak TODO,1.270,1.271

[Sven D. <sv...@oz...>]

On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 06:48, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:33:32PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 05:01:03AM -0800, sven dowideit wrote:
> 
> > > wish debian developers were more comunity oriented, and posted back their fixes upstream.
> 
> > Huh?  Which fixes?
> 
> Right, some more mails finally came through from Sourceforge.

> 
> The libxml related changes you probably want to revert.  They're bodges
> for things that have been fixed for quite some time by the configure
> script in CVS.
yeah, i just applied all of the diff, and commited after it built fine..

works thought :)
> 
> The other two just got dropped on the floor, sorry - I wanted to make
> sure they made it through all the buildds and to try them with some
> older kernel headers too (and just generally worked on machines other
> than mine) but forgot about it.

humpf, and grin.

i finally started thinking about spending some time one it, and it
didn't even build. I started to fix the problems, and then realised that
you probably had to fix them already :)

i'm a bit weirded out by the popularity of powertweak (from the sf
stats) but the compelete lack of feedback for it. I assume its just not
user friendly enough so ppl try it, and then remove it. :( 

sven