From: Bob F. <bfr...@si...> - 2005-09-03 03:46:07
|
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, John Bowler wrote: > From: Bob Friesenhahn >> From looking at the MNG specification, it appears that an empty >> PLTE is expected here. > > IIRC it's not possible to implement the correct handling of unknown chunks > in a PNG stream if the PLTE is completely omitted - the ordering rules say > that order wrt the PLTE (before or after) must be preserved. I believe an > emtpy PLTE was used as a placeholder in MNG to handle this. An extra twelve bytes per sub-image have been sacrificed. While this is a difficult cross for me to bear, the final result works great! :-) Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn bfr...@si..., http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ |