Re: [png-mng-misc] VOTE YES: PNG-in-GIF 20070414

[Adam M. C. <png...@ni...>]

John Bowler <jb...@ac...> wrote:

> the proposal is harmless - either people use it, in which case
> application interoperability is aided by a common definition endorsed
> by the PNG Group or they don't use it, in which case, who cares?

Regardless of whether I favor or disfavor PNG-in-GIF (I'm still
considering it), I find this argument unsettling.  Why doesn't the same
argument apply to the APNG proposal, or any proposal to extend any
format in any way?

AMC