Re: [pmd-devel] Modularizing PMD?

[Andreas D. <ad...@us...>]

Hi,

> Is there a reason for PMD including all languages in one monolithic jar?
No, there is no special reason other than it happens to be that way
currently.

I had this modularization in mind for a while but hadn't time yet to
tackle it. Maybe I can shift the priorities and start this soon...

Regards,
Andreas


On 06.09.2014 13:45, schrieb Christofer Dutz:
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> after not receiving a response on my last post, I had a look at the
> PMD code.
>
>  
>
> Is there a reason for PMD including all languages in one monolithic jar?
>
>  
>
> Wouldn't it be cooler to have each language located in a dedicated
> module and to have some sort of language-registry in the core module
> that includes all the languages it finds in PMDs classpath?
>
>  
>
> For maven for example I could add a pluginDependency to
> flex-pmd-plugin for example and then I could support flex without
> having to add all the flex code to PMDs codebase.
>
>  
>
> I would be happy to help or even completely do such a conversion myself.
>
> Would there be any reasons to make PMD pluggable?
>
>  
>
> Chris
>
>  
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.  
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pmd-devel mailing list
> Pmd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmd-devel


-- 
Andreas Dangel
https://github.com/adangel
skype: andreas_dangel