From: Stu T. <st...@no...> - 2005-11-24 21:17:56
|
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 15:36 +0100, Pekka Riikonen wrote: > : 1) As you mentioned earlier on this list, there is no way to tell if the > : img tag was actually text entered by the user or a genuine image tag. > : > : One possible resolution to this would be for the Gaim core to always > : send html to the prpls, even those that do not set the > : GAIM_CONNECTION_HTML flag, then the "text only" prpls could scan for img > : tags before gaim_unescape_html'ing the message themselves. I'm not sure > : if this is what we want to do though. What do others think? > : > Some generic solution would be nice, but in case of SILC the > GAIM_CONNECTION_HTML flag could perhaps be set to get rid of the problem. I don't think setting GAIM_CONNECTION_HTML for SILC would be a good idea, as the UI would then give the impression that message formatting was supported. I went ahead and made the change I suggested above, to always send html from the core, and let prpls do what they want with it. > However, I still would like to see the IM_IMAGE flag delivered correctly > to the prpl, so that there would not have to be message parsing if we know > there isn't images. I did this too, along with removing GaimConvImFlags and GaimConvChatFlags (we use GaimMessageFlags instead now). We're a bit closer to image support in chats too. I've now applied this patch, with my modifications to work with older SILC Toolkits. Thanks for the patch! Regards, Stu. |