From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2005-11-11 16:59:13
|
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:48:21AM -0500, Evan Schoenberg wrote: > > Herein lies a very important fact: With no video/voice support, users > (except a small but vocal group who love to be obnoxious) > understand. "Gaim does not support webcams." "Gaim does not support > voice." Straightforward. If we add a feature, it should be Right > before shipping. Of course, by that logic, AIM shouldn't have > DirectIM support (well, it doesn't, basically) and MSN perhaps > shouldn't be shipping (since it crashes). There's something to be > said for getting it out there first and refining it later, certainly, > but 2.0.0 is going to be a huge and wonderful release... I'd hate to > see something which appears very exciting (voice support! or, better > yet, voice/video support!) be a detracting rather than an enhancing > factor to the release. > > From reading commits (I haven't updated and compiled this week), it > looks like there's still lots of work to be done for the voice > support which has been added. Is that work going to take away from > making the new status system right before shipping? > > -Evan > www.adiumx.com > Sean hasn't done much with status since before he started at google. Tim and Kingant, along with a number of patch authors, have been the heros here. If they get status stable before voice is, then we'll ship 2.0.0 without voice. luke |