Re: [Gaim-devel] Problem with catch-all ignore for formatting on incoming messages...

[Christian H. <ch...@gn...>]

On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 04:47:05PM -0400, Kevin M Stange wrote:
> I believe Christian and Etan were against the original change when it=20
> came up for discussion, and I have to agree that I think I liked the=20
> prefs better as three as well.
>=20
> I think this is a good candidate for adding back, but it's not my=20
> decision, and it depends whether enough other people found the split=20
> prefs appropriate.
>=20
> Who else has thoughts?
>=20
> Kevin

I'm still for splitting them back into three. We're getting rid of a
lot of prefs, which is good, and I think keeping these separate won't
really hurt anything.

Christian

--=20
Christian Hammond         <>  The GNUpdate Project
ch...@gn...      <>  http://www.gnupdate.org/
   "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."
      -- Popular Mechanics, 1949