From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2004-05-21 14:00:30
|
i am not sure this is an answer to your question, i haven't fully read that webpage, and i certainly haven't followed the work that resulted in c99. i do know that gaim needs to continue to compile on gcc 2.95, far too many people are not yet using a gcc 3.x compiler, and 2.95 doesn't have c99 support. luke On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:35:36PM +0000, Eduardo P?rez wrote: > I've seen the patch below. > Shouldn't gaim be using ISO C named notation for initializing members? > (as Linux source tries to do as much as possible) > http://home.tiscalinet.ch/t_wolf/tw/c/c9x_changes.html > Example: > struct {int a, b, c, d;} s = > { .a = 1, .c = 3, 4, .b = 5}; > > The current state of not using named notation for initializing members > is because you don't want that notation or because no one has sent > patches to change to named notation? Maybe I'm missing something else. > > Eduardo > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/gaim/gaim/src/protocols/msn/msn.c,v > > retrieving revision 1.284 > > retrieving revision 1.285 > > diff -u -d -p -r1.284 -r1.285 > > --- msn.c 16 May 2004 07:19:52 -0000 1.284 > > +++ msn.c 21 May 2004 00:32:45 -0000 1.285 > > @@ -1709,7 +1709,8 @@ static GaimPluginInfo info = > > > > NULL, /**< ui_info */ > > &prpl_info, /**< extra_info */ > > - &prefs_info /**< prefs_info */ > > + &prefs_info, /**< prefs_info */ > > + NULL > > }; > > > > static void > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gaim-devel mailing list > Gai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-devel |