From: Manuel V. <man...@st...> - 2005-01-07 16:31:16
|
Reini Urban wrote: > I'll have a look after 1.3.11 but I still see no technical reason, why > this should be better than tablename prefixes. Merging all the seperate > table sets into one big mess... I agree, it's not technical reasons. I just "fell" it not very elegant (tables multiplications). > Other than helping administrative SQL tasks outside the wiki maybe. > Schema upgrades are done now via action=upgrade. > But a simple mysql script is also easy, looping over all existing > prefixes. Should I provide such a script for wikifarm schema upgrades? I think that wikifarm users are able to do their own upgrades. > But for gforge integration it is really not needed. I discuss very long time with Christian Bayle from gforge team and we have the same felling: "multiplication of tables is bad" but without rational facts to justify our feeling. Current way of phpwiki integration under gforge is to have only one wiki and each project create pages into this big wiki. My way is to provide one independent wiki for each project. Current state seems to work (around 1 month of tests without any problems) but I prefer waiting for phpwiki 1.3.11 release before release the plugin. Regards, Manuel -- # VACELET Manuel manuel.vacelet-abecedaire(at)st(dot)com # # Tel: 042 6089 +33 (0)476 92 6089 # # STMicroelectronics # # 850, rue Jean Monet - 38926 CROLLES CEDEX - FRANCE # |