From: Jost B. <jos...@ya...> - 2004-09-29 16:12:33
|
> do you plan to create a CNI version your > natcJavaBridge.c? Well, CNI is certainly a much nicer interface to access java objects from C or C++ than JNI. If I start to develop an application from scratch, I would certainly consider CNI as an interface to access java objects---well, today I would probably choose .NET/MONO instead of java, but that's a different story. But since the bridge uses JNI and the JNI binding is now more or less bug-free, I don't think we should rewrite the code to use CNI. About 60% of the code is JNI code and the rest is standard socket code. However, I will certainly accept a patch if you want to write a CNI binding. Jost ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 100MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de |