From: Graham B. <gb...@po...> - 2001-06-21 21:19:29
|
----- Forwarded message from Jim Dutton <ji...@ws...> ----- Return-Path: <po...@mu...> Received: (from pobox@localhost) by monty.mutatus.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5LKkGB48447 for gbarr; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:46:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from pobox) Received: from dolly2.pobox.com (dolly2.pobox.com [208.210.125.92]) by monty.mutatus.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5LKkBU48434 for <po...@mu...>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:46:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ji...@ws...) Received: from dolly2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dolly2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9137E25EE1 for <po...@mu...>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:47:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ws179149.56kdialup.siu.edu (ws179149.56kdialup.siu.edu [131.230.179.149]) by dolly2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6B225F12 for <gb...@po...>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ws17903.56kdialup.siu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f5K4acZ00701 for gb...@po...; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:36:38 -0820 (GMT) Message-Id: <200...@ws...> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:36:37 +0000 (CDT) From: Jim Dutton <ji...@ws...> Reply-To: ji...@si... Subject: anonymous bind with "empty" DN and passwd? (perl-ldap-0.22) To: Graham Barr <gb...@po...> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii It appears that attempting to perform/request an annonymous bind while supplying "empty" DN and password parameters causes a bind failure. Using no parameters succeeds with an annonymous bind, but I am interested in using a static model that allows me to fill in the DN and password parameters as needed, but still affect an annonymous bind without having to include extra code and a seperate bind statement. Thank you. ----- End forwarded message ----- |