From: Michal H. <ms...@gm...> - 2009-09-08 09:40:32
|
Hi Jozo, It is some time since we discussed this and there is (stiil) no outcome. Tools are not compilable under Linux (and others make based platforms) because of boost-program-options not being detected and added to our compilation/library flags. This means that nobody is able to compile them without some tweaking. What we will do about it? (I am asking you, because you have added these files to our code base). One another thing is that we should move the directory from under tests to src if they are intended for public use. -- Michal Hocko |
From: Jozef M. <mis...@ho...> - 2009-09-08 11:26:32
|
---------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:40:18 +0200 > From: ms...@gm... > To: mis...@ho... > CC: pdf...@li... > Subject: tools not compileable under Linux - What we will do about it? > > Hi Jozo, > > It is some time since we discussed this and there is (stiil) no outcome. > Tools are not compilable under Linux (and others make based platforms) > because of boost-program-options not being detected and added to our > compilation/library flags. This means that nobody is able to compile > them without some tweaking. > > What we will do about it? (I am asking you, because you have added these > files to our code base). 1st option (the best one but requires work) - Update scripts for boost program options <- your task - Update tools to not use getopt which is not supported by VS <- my task 2ng option leave it as it is and we will have different tools for linux and windows > One another thing is that we should move the directory from under tests > to src if they are intended for public use. agree, if you move it i will adjust win stuff. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009 |
From: Michal H. <ms...@gm...> - 2009-09-08 22:06:30
|
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:26:20AM +0000, Jozef Misutka wrote: > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:40:18 +0200 > > From: ms...@gm... > > To: mis...@ho... > > CC: pdf...@li... > > Subject: tools not compileable under Linux - What we will do about it? > > > > Hi Jozo, > > > > It is some time since we discussed this and there is (stiil) no outcome. > > Tools are not compilable under Linux (and others make based platforms) > > because of boost-program-options not being detected and added to our > > compilation/library flags. This means that nobody is able to compile > > them without some tweaking. > > > > What we will do about it? (I am asking you, because you have added these > > files to our code base). > > 1st option (the best one but requires work) > - Update scripts for boost program options <- your task Patchset already sent to support mailing list for testing. I will post here as well as soon as I get some feedback and test it on different systems (at least Gentoo and Suse 32/64b). Please have a look at patches (they are attached to the email "[Pdfedit-support] tools compilation rework]"). I have tried to make it like all other configuration options so it should be OK, but another pair of eyes would be definitely a good idea. > - Update tools to not use getopt which is not supported by VS <- my task OK, you can start as soon as the patchset is in the CVS to prevent from merge conflicts (one of the patches move all files to src/tools). > > 2ng option > leave it as it is and we will have different tools for linux and windows > > > > One another thing is that we should move the directory from under tests > > to src if they are intended for public use. > > agree, if you move it i will adjust win stuff. Part of the patch. -- Michal Hocko |