[Pcgendm-trackers] [ pcgendm-Bugs-879250 ] [ALL] Damage tag has changed

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #879250, was opened at 2004-01-18 08:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ericbeaudoin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=417816&aid=879250&group_id=36698

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: David R. Bender (papa_drb)
>Assigned to: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony)
Summary: [ALL] Damage tag has changed

Initial Comment:
Per Jayme Cox:

Could I get a tracker monkey to open a FREQ on 
PCGen::DM to change the following tags:

BONUS:COMBAT|SECONDARYATTACKS
-> BONUS:COMBAT|ATTACKS-SECONDARY

BONUS:COMBAT|SECONDARYDAMAGE
-> BONUS:COMBAT|DAMAGE-SECONDARY

Docs the above as deprecated/changed

And all BONUS:DAMAGE tags should be changed

BONUS:DAMAGE|blah
-> BONUS:COMBAT|DAMAGE.blah

-- david (aka Papa-DRB)
OSh/Data Tracker Monkey


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Eric Beaudoin (ericbeaudoin)
Date: 2004-09-19 20:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=324612

Roll back it is. Although I really would like to know where 
Jayme got the idea. Maybe there was something else bihind 
this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony)
Date: 2004-09-16 14:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=886893

Eric, we need to decide which way to go. Either we move forward and 
change the tags, (if we do I recomend doing it after 5.8) or we roll this 
change back. 

If we roll it back we will need to do several things, first this is in the 
docs and we'll need to undeprecate the entries. Second we'll need to tell 
the code monkeys not to remove the old tags and deprecate the new 
ones while leaving them both active.

Last we disscussed you were of the mind to roll things back. If you have 
not changed in that opinion assign this back to me with any additional 
details of what needs to be done if I missed any above.

If we do go forward lower the priority as you see fit. Thanks

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Doug McMillan (dmcmill)
Date: 2004-02-25 15:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=705399

Neither I nor any other data person I know of was consulted 
on this till I have time to look this over I am not making any 
sweeping changes that will fubar the data

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=417816&aid=879250&group_id=36698