From: Michalis K. <mic...@ca...> - 2006-05-20 18:47:20
|
(sorry if you receive this mail twice, I had (once again) problems with my mails reaching sf.net, hopefully now it's OK) Thomas Mueller wrote: > Hi Michalis, > > On 5/13/06, Michalis Kamburelis <mk...@po...> wrote: > >> Sourceforge CVS infrastructure has undergone major changes. In >> particular, CVS server name changed: it used to be >> "cvs.sourceforge.net", now it should be "pasdoc.cvs.sourceforge.net". > > > Since this topic comes up: What about migrating to Subversion? > Sourceforge has been offering it for a while now and several Projects > have migrated, including the JCL and JVCL, so it seems to be viable. > > I for one prefer svn over cvs any time. > > twm > See the bottom of my initial mail :) Quoting myself: " As a sidenote, sourceforge launched officially SVN service some time ago (in February if I remember right) and I plan to move our development from CVS to SVN at some time (as I believe that SVN is simply much better than CVS). But I'm busy right now with other projects, so this will wait. I just wanted to say here that the move to SVN *will* be done --- unless someone has any concerns. " In summary, I absolutely agree with you --- SVN is much better than CVS, and we should move to SVN. I didn't do it, simply because there is noone actively working on pasdoc right now. I plan to get back to pasdoc around September (I was busy lately with my game for [http://pascalgamedevelopment.com/] competition, and now I'll have to finish some other things). Do you want to work on pasdoc in the nearest future ? If yes, then I should find the time and move us to SVN --- I think that I have all the permissions to do that as a project admin. Michalis |