From: Philippe E. <ph...@wa...> - 2004-04-28 18:50:15
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 at 11:15 +0000, Yaoping Ruan wrote: > Hi, > well, it is hard to believe it is HTML. My email was written in Netscape > Inbox with plain text only. This message is from "pine". Hope it can get > through. right that's why I didn't undertand the rejection, anyway if it occur again I'll look deeper. > Back to my question, thanks for the answer. Just confirm that the buffer > is the event buffer explained in the Internal, not the CPU buffer, right? > I notice "--buffer-size" option for opcontrol. I assume it is for the > event buffer. Then is it possible that CPU buffer also overflows? And how I think you use a 2.4 module, the only relevant parameter is --buffer-size and --note-table-size (note table size can overflow if there is a lot of fork/exec/mmap). > can I decrease sampling rate? Is it set by increasing the overflow "count" > value for each event? yes, to decrease sampling rate you must increase count with $ opcontrol --event=XXX:counts, the ~root/.oprofile/daemonrc file contains your setting which are persistent over different profiling session, perhaps during experimentation you setup count to a very low value and don't re set it ? regards, Phil |