From: Philippe E. <ph...@wa...> - 2003-04-21 19:52:46
|
John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 09:49:46PM +0000, Philippe Elie wrote: > > >>you asked to use tgid in the implementation, either we use tgid >>in implementation and user interface either pid > > > OK, tgid it is. But I'm not sure you followed my point. pp_interface > currently says : > > 3.15 pid: <pidlist> > Comma list of pid's to consider. This defines a thread group > including all child threads (task->tgid) > > FIXME: tgid should also be accepted for this ? > > which is inconsistent with the merge spec. So we should have : > > 3.15 tgid: <tgidlist> > Comm list of tgid's to consider. > > right ? right I missed this one, I though we was using tgid in all place Phil |