From: Dave J. <da...@su...> - 2002-10-13 21:32:32
|
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:26:55PM -0400, graydon hoare wrote: > On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 07:54, Dave Jones wrote: > > > 64bit AMD hammer support is now 99.9% there, needs a little more work, > > but if you wnat to holdback on that until next release, I don't have > > a problem with it. > > fwiw, I think I'm scheduled to help on the hammer port for three weeks > starting next monday (oct 21); if you could post what you've got done > sometime between now and then you'll get a free hand (assuming it's not > all done by then :) Heh, cool. It's pretty much in the last lap stage it seems. Jan Hubicka fixed up some silly gaps in the syscall wrappers last week, and it's now functional, but seems a bit flaky. What would be useful would be another set of eyes going over things looking for missed 32 bit assumptions and the likes. I'll be bringing everything up to patch against current CVS in the next day or so, and will post an url to the patch when I've done so. Thanks for the offer of help 8) Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs |